Zodiac Casino review
Zodiac is the Casino Rewards brand built around a single sentence: eighty spins on Mega Money Wheel for one. It is the cheapest entry on this site and it is not a no-deposit offer, which is a distinction most pages about Zodiac decline to make.
Zodiac Casino
Read on the operator’s page, 26 October 2026
80 spins for a deposit of 1
Get this offerAdvertising link · 18+ · the operator’s own terms are the ones that decide
The studios behind this lobby
The offer, and what is attached to it
Read on 26 October 2026: Eighty spins on the "Mega Money Wheel" follow a deposit of one, then up to four hundred and eighty across the next four deposits, with ten as the minimum from the second onwards, all of it read on the group’s "Sign Up Bonus Information" page. Eighty spins for one is the cheapest entry on this site; it is not, however, a no- deposit offer, and this page will not file it as one.
A small first deposit is the nearest thing to a free start that an established operator will run, and in practice it is frequently the better of the two: the money staked is the reader’s own rather than "bonus funds" (not withdrawable until the requirement has been met, whatever the balance on the screen says), the requirement attaches to a smaller sum, and nothing has to be converted before it can be withdrawn. It is not free, though, and this page will not call it free.
The condition to look for on an offer of this shape is the "game contribution" table, which sets how much of a stake counts towards the requirement: slots usually count in full, while tables and live games count at ten per cent or at nothing at all (and a requirement that looks small on paper becomes ten times itself on a roulette table).
Who holds the licence
Three licences are on file rather than one, which is usual in a group that serves several markets: KGC · 00972 · Fresh Horizons Ltd, then UKGC · 038620-R-319310-013 · Apollo Entertainment Limited, then AGCO · Apollo Entertainment Ltd. Each names a regulator, a number or a company that can be checked on its own, and a brand that drops one of them has usually left a market rather than lost a licence.
The brand is part of the Casino Rewards Group and is operated by Apollo Entertainment Ltd, with Kahnawake 00972 held by Fresh Horizons Ltd and a Gambling Commission licence held by Apollo. It has been running since 2001.
A licence number is worth checking rather than reading, and we check ours against the regulator's own register. Which register, what each authority obliges, and why the activities an entry covers matter as much as the number itself are on the page about licences, written once instead of under every brand.
The games, the suppliers and the currencies
The games are supplied by Apricot and by Games Global (Microgaming until 2022), and the group carries what the trade calls an "eCOGRA certification", which audits the random number generator and says nothing whatever about the terms attached to a bonus.
The suppliers matter more than the size of the catalogue, and the figure a lobby prints (a "1,300+ games" or a "2,000+") counts titles rather than studios, which is the less useful of the two numbers. A multi-provider casino can lose a studio overnight and the games go with it; a single-supplier casino cannot lose one (the same fact read the other way round), since whatever that studio does badly (a thin live-dealer range, a slow mobile client) it does badly across the whole site. The lobby will not tell you this: a filter marked "Live Casino" and another marked "Slots" names a shelf rather than the studio that stocked it, and the studio is the thing that can leave (on thirty days, in most of these contracts, and with no notice to a player at all).
What counts against it
The wagering requirement across this group is two hundred times, which is the highest on this site by a wide margin and twenty times the ceiling a British licence would allow. None of it is concealed, since the group publishes the figure on its own pages; we repeat it because a page that prints the spin count and leaves out the multiplier is printing the half that sells. On a forty-spin offer worth a few units, "200x" is not a detail attached to the offer, it is the offer!
We publish this because a reader deciding where to open an account is entitled to it, and because an affiliate page that leaves it out has chosen the commission over the reader. It is not a verdict on the operator (we have not played here, and a regulator’s finding is not a conviction), nor is it the "safety index" that the aggregators publish, which is a score and not a finding. It is on the record, and the record is what a page like this one is for.
It is not a "warning list" entry either (those are lists of sites a reviewer has taken against, kept by the reviewer), because what is set out above is a public act with a date and an issuing body on it; the two get quoted interchangeably on pages like this one, and they are not the same kind of thing at all.
What we did not verify
We have not opened an account here, deposited, played or withdrawn, so there is no score on this page and no structured review data behind it (the method this site follows allows a "Review" mark-up only after a first-hand test that the owner has declared, and none has been declared). What we could not confirm from a primary source is: the withdrawal limits and the processing times, which we have not tested.
That list is not a reason to avoid this operator and it is not a reason to trust it. It is the line between what this page checked (a licence register, the operator’s own offer page, and a regulator’s own publications) and what it did not, and a page calling itself "independently reviewed" without drawing that line anywhere is asking a reader to take all of it on the same footing.
What this page does not do is rank: there is no "best casino" here and no score, and how we read an operator says what we check, what we cannot check, and why the order of every list is the one stated at the top of it.
Other offers on this site
The ones credited without a deposit come first, then the ones that start from a first deposit of one to five, which is the order a reader of this site is most likely to want. Every button below is an advertising link, and the licence under each name is the part worth reading before the figure beside it.
Casino Classic
No deposit
1 spin on the Mega Money Wheel read 26 October 2026
Nothing deposited · then 40 spins from a first deposit of 1
Licence KGC · Fresh Horizons Ltd
Advertising link · 18+
Casino Kingdom
No deposit
1 spin on the Mega Money Wheel read 26 October 2026
Nothing deposited · then 40 spins from a first deposit of 1
Licence KGC · Rock Swift Group Ltd
Advertising link · 18+
Lucky Nugget
No deposit
40 free spins for a first deposit of C$1 read 14 October 2026
A separate no-deposit spins landing also runs on the affiliate channel
Licence AGCC · Baytree
Advertising link · 18+
Ruby Fortune
No deposit
A no-deposit spins landing, count not fixed read 14 October 2026
The number and the terms are set on that page, and they move
Licence AGCC · Baytree
Advertising link · 18+
Spin Casino
No deposit
A no-deposit spins landing, count not fixed read 14 October 2026
The number and the terms are set on that page, and they move
Licence AGCC · Baytree
Advertising link · 18+
All Slots Casino
Low first deposit
C$1,500 across four deposits read 29 October 2026
From C$5 · ten daily chances at the million-dollar draw
Licence AGCC · Baytree
Advertising link · 18+
Questions readers ask
Is there a no-deposit bonus at Zodiac Casino?
No. The offer begins with a deposit. Pages that say otherwise are quoting an offer that is not on the operator’s own page.
Who licenses Zodiac Casino?
KGC · 00972 · Fresh Horizons Ltd. The regulator publishes a register where that number can be checked.
Why is there no rating for Zodiac Casino?
Because we have not opened an account, deposited and withdrawn here. A score given without doing that is decoration, so the space other sites give to one is given here to the licence.
Can I take this offer from my country?
That depends on where you are. Readers in several countries are shown the page written for their own market instead of this one, because the operators here are not licensed everywhere.
The operators on this page are not licensed in every country our readers write from. Where an operator may not lawfully be advertised, this site shows the page written for that country instead. Readers who block scripts may still reach this page; the links will not open for them.
By the No Deposit Bonus editorial team · Last updated October 2026 · Online since 2014